|
|
Post by carl on Nov 22, 2014 13:37:22 GMT -6
Just got an email from the Omega Boutique. They finally got a titanium Seamaster 300, with blue dial/bezel. Going down later today to take a look. Here is a pic that Sasan sent to me:  Cheers, Carl |
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,793 
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Nov 22, 2014 14:07:00 GMT -6
I like the look but I still can't warm up to polished centre links, especially on a diver. If they brushed it, I'd love it.
That giant polished centre link at 6 stands out too much for me
|
|
|
|
Post by carl on Nov 22, 2014 14:27:10 GMT -6
Well, I'm not totally convinced that the Seamaster 300 is for me anyway. I saw a comparison shot with a Seamaster 300 and a 42mm PO, and I actually liked the PO better.
Apart from the fact that the bracelet on the PO is brushed, it looks - and actually is - more comfortable than the Seamaster 300. And that is the 45.5mm XL.
I already checked about having the center links brushed, which I believe is the only way to go. It can be done, and they do charge for it, around $180. I believe.
For me, there is something about a watch that says it's not for me, if I don't like the overall aesthetic of the watch, ie case, bezel, dial, bracelet. They all have to work together. What I do after is a different matter, as far as getting new straps etc. but the original "as is" has to appeal in all aspects.
I'm hooked on titanium after owning the Z-33 for a while. But there are plenty of other models out there anyway.
|
|
Baco Noir
WWF Advisor 
WWF Admin
Posts: 31,338
Name: Roger
|
Post by Baco Noir on Nov 22, 2014 14:43:38 GMT -6
I'm with you Carl. Something doesn't add up for me either. I think it's a combination of minor details. The center links being polished and too wide, and the Arabic numbers seem too small or too far away from the hour markers.
You should look for a vintage style SM300 like I have Carl or have Al make one for you. Then you'd have two modern and two vintage period pieces from the same maker.
|
|
|
|
Post by carl on Nov 22, 2014 15:30:57 GMT -6
I'm with you Carl. Something doesn't add up for me either. I think it's a combination of minor details. The center links being polished and too wide, and the Arabic numbers seem too small or too far away from the hour markers. You should look for a vintage style SM300 like I have Carl or have Al make one for you. Then you'd have two modern and two vintage period pieces from the same maker. Hi Roger, I have actually thought about going vintage, from Al, just as you did. I think it's a great look. Also - and here I am repeating myself - Basel 2015 is just coming up. My satisfaction and joy with the Mark II and the Z-33, though, is more than enough to curb my enthusiasm and, hopefully, my impulsiveness, until the new models come out next year. With the '63 Seamaster as well, I often wonder what more I could possibly want. |
|
Archer
WWF Veteran
Posts: 2,941
Since: Jan 15, 2007 17:14:14 GMT -6
|
Post by Archer on Nov 23, 2014 8:29:53 GMT -6
PCL's take 2 minutes to brush...everyone keeps complaining about them on this watch, but in reality it's a non issue. Hell if one of you guys buys one of these, I'll brush the bracelet for free if you pay the postage!
Cheers, Al
|
|
|
|
Post by rw16610 on Nov 23, 2014 12:40:53 GMT -6
I like the look of that blue! It's a nice watch, for sure. Polished center links don't really bother me but I would also consider having them brushed for the long run. That brushed finish hides little scratches far better!
|
|
|
|
Post by carl on Nov 23, 2014 19:47:45 GMT -6
Well, I had a good, long look at this model yesterday. I decided that - all brushed or pcl - the bracelet really does nothing for me. Either way, I would likely not get the watch. I imagine in a year or two, like it was with the AT8500, it will be available with leatlher strap, then I might consider it. The bracelet alone is likely at least $1200, and it would be a shame to get a watch with such a bracelet that would never be worn. Another issue for me with the bracelet, is that end centre link being so large, as it extends the full length of the long lugs. A beautiful leather strap with titanium deployant would be the answer.
Really liked the shade of blue on the bezel with the Liquid Metal instead of the one I saw before with the gold. Side-by-side with the titanium PO, there is very little difference if any in the shade of blue on the bezel.
As Roger mentioned, the four arabics on the dial just seem too close to the centre of the dial, at the end of those fairly long markers.
Sorry, but I think there are just too many little bits on this watch that would bother me, and in the end it would likely be flipped.
|
|
|
|
Post by carl on Nov 23, 2014 19:56:41 GMT -6
I like the look but I still can't warm up to polished centre links, especially on a diver. If they brushed it, I'd love it. That giant polished centre link at 6 stands out too much for me I found that centre link way too large as well. Actually, even if the bracelet was all brushed, I think that I might still have an issue with that. Taking a long look at the bracelet again, I really wasn't that keen on it. It also seemed very thin to me. Those things, I know, would really bug me. |
|
aquajoe
WWF Veteran
Posts: 5,693
Since: Jan 17, 2013 20:13:30 GMT -6
|
Post by aquajoe on Mar 1, 2015 21:44:21 GMT -6
I tried this watch on today. For me the center links shouldn't be polished but more important than that for a deal killer is the long straight lugs and the white seconds hand.
|
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,793
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Mar 1, 2015 22:35:19 GMT -6
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
Post by katgirl on Mar 1, 2015 22:38:06 GMT -6
Omega missed the boat, ( the dive boat  ) with this one. It's as if they tried too hard to create a modern version of the vintage 300 diver, and it just didn't work. I much prefer Roger's. |
|
|
|
Post by carl on Mar 3, 2015 15:47:10 GMT -6
Omega missed the boat, ( the dive boat ) with this one. It's as if they tried too hard to create a modern version of the vintage 300 diver, and it just didn't work. I much prefer Roger's. I agree here. Although I have tried it on countless times, and with various straps and bracelets, it just does not work for me. Well, there are plenty of other models from which to choose. I do have to make an admission, though, in a small way with a bit of guilt: Since I have discovered the Grand Seiko line for myself, it has really taken the spotlight away from Omega for me. Not just one thing, but a number of small factors. I have no complaint about the build quality of my Omegas - quite the contrary - but I believe, in a few ways, the GS is just a cut above. And they manage to make a number of models in a size that I like, my preference being in the 34mm - 39mm range. I just can't get that any more with the Omega pieces.
Anyway, sorry to ramble. Just some observations I have made the past few months.
Cheers, Carl
|
|
|
|
Post by zachb on Mar 16, 2015 16:06:25 GMT -6
I don't know how impressed I am with the blue. I like the titanium, but after looking at the watch for a while, to me the blue looks a bit drab.
|
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,793
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Mar 16, 2015 18:05:05 GMT -6
I just can't do the polished bits. It's too much.
|
|
) with this one. It's as if they tried too hard to create a modern version of the vintage 300 diver, and it just didn't work. I much prefer Roger's.
