CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,827 
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Oct 30, 2005 15:19:06 GMT -6
Too bad it had to go to make room for the PO.   |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Oct 30, 2005 15:20:37 GMT -6
That was a good looking watch Chip. How long did you have it? Less than a week right?  |
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,827
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Oct 30, 2005 15:25:12 GMT -6
That was a good looking watch Chip. How long did you have it? Less than a week right? About three weeks actually. I wish it was brushed instead of polished though. Maybe a seawolf is in my extended future..... |
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,827
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Oct 30, 2005 15:26:35 GMT -6
that was one huge chunk of steel... hockey puck of a watch though!  |
|
|
|
Post by mike on Oct 30, 2005 16:23:35 GMT -6
I like the Superocean,that would be my first pick in the Breitling line.
|
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,827
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Oct 30, 2005 16:25:52 GMT -6
I like the Superocean,that would be my first pick in the Breitling line. Maybe if I would have bought a superocean I would have kept it. the superocean steelfish x-plus that I had is about 5 or 6 hundred dollars more than the superocean. |
|
|
|
Post by MartynJC (UK) on Oct 30, 2005 17:05:08 GMT -6
Nice hunk of metal Chip!  |
|
|
|
Post by bruces on Oct 30, 2005 17:53:28 GMT -6
I enjoyed the SO I had. My only complaint was that it was a bit thick, but that goes with the water resistence rating. I hear some of the Breitling guys just get the finish brushed or bead blasted. Doesn't cost much either!
|
|
|
|
Post by Bob on Oct 30, 2005 19:11:32 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Oct 31, 2005 0:03:37 GMT -6
I wish you had kept it, Chip....so much better looking than the PO!!
|
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,827
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
|
Post by CHIP on Oct 31, 2005 0:36:41 GMT -6
I wish you had kept it, Chip....so much better looking than the PO!! You think??? I like the PO better. |
|
|
|
Post by mamas on Oct 31, 2005 3:51:28 GMT -6
I wish you had kept it, Chip....so much better looking than the PO!! no way jose! i saw one of these steelfish x pluses for the first time this w/e, and i thought it was just rather too big and awkward.. felt that the PO is a far more elegant, better looking watch. |
|
|
|
Post by erik on Oct 31, 2005 13:25:25 GMT -6
JJ, are you serious?  (nothing wrong with your choice) I agree with Mamas. Chip you did the right thing, lovely PO |
|
I'm seriously considering the Avenger Seawolf. It's a big watch but not heavy as it's titanium. I think it will make a nice addition to my collection 
