blil
New Member
Posts: 2
Since: Sept 5, 2007 12:03:24 GMT -6
|
Post by blil on Sept 5, 2007 12:34:48 GMT -6
Hello, all. I have a 17-year old TAG-Heuer 1000 series quartz that's giving me fits. It had been running fine up until the battery died about 2 years ago. Instead of paying a fortune to send it in to TAG, I had a guy at a local jewler replace the battery. It was running quite fast; picking up a few minutes per hour. When I took it back to him he absolved himself of any guilt and said I would need to send it in to TAG if it wasn't running correctly. Not wanting to spend the money, I set it in a nightstand for a year. I got another jeweler to put a battery in it today and it's still running fast. Couple of questions: 1) Is there any way to verify that the proper battery is in the watch? Aren't there dozens of watch batteries of virtually the same size/shape? What would happen if, say, the first jeweler put the wrong voltage battery in the watch? 2) Do I have any option(s) besides sending it off to TAG? Bottom line is this watch cost me $400 17 years ago and I just can't justify a $200 repair/cleaning bill for it. Any advice would be appreciated, Bill
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Sept 5, 2007 15:09:39 GMT -6
Welcome to the forum Bill! I wouldn't think the battery would cause a watch to run fast or slow. I bet you can google and find out the correct battery for the watch. Usually with a quartz movement, if it craps out it's cheaper to replace the movement than it is to service it. My wife's quartz Omega Constellation's movement corroded from a leaky battery. If I replaced the individual parts it would cost as much or more than the entire movement. My local jeweler charged something like $100-150 to replace the movement with a new Omega movement. You shouldn't have to send the watch to Tag....an independent local jeweler should be able to fix it.
|
|
ktm8m
New Member
Posts: 13
Since: Sept 7, 2007 0:58:52 GMT -6
|
Post by ktm8m on Sept 7, 2007 4:56:56 GMT -6
I had the same problem with mine - a 9 year old tag bought in 1991. Changed the battery twice too - once on holiday and soon after I cam back to UK. I had it also serviced by Watches of Switzerland in Bond Street. Result!? : - still "crap". Eventually I took it to my watchmaker. He pointed out to me a number of serious faults with the watch (not the battery) and I decided to get a quotation from LVMH UK. Price for "repair" £190. Sold it on eBay for £205 (paid £225 in 1991 in Singapore). Never bought a Tag since - Well over rated watches.
|
|
blil
New Member
Posts: 2
Since: Sept 5, 2007 12:03:24 GMT -6
|
Post by blil on Sept 7, 2007 16:19:28 GMT -6
I had the same problem with mine - a 9 year old tag bought in 1991. Changed the battery twice too - once on holiday and soon after I cam back to UK. I had it also serviced by Watches of Switzerland in Bond Street. Result!? : - still "crap". Eventually I took it to my watchmaker. He pointed out to me a number of serious faults with the watch (not the battery) and I decided to get a quotation from LVMH UK. Price for "repair" £190. Sold it on eBay for £205 (paid £225 in 1991 in Singapore). Never bought a Tag since - Well over rated watches. Very interesting info. Thanks. I found a place online that will look at it for free and give me an estimate. I'll see what they say. I already sold my other TAG (a 2000 series automatic chronograph) because it, too, was very unreliable and I didn't want to shell out the bucks to get it overhauled by TAG. I'll never buy another one of their watches, either. I've learned my lesson.
|
|