|
Post by erik on Nov 8, 2005 6:09:38 GMT -6
Yesterday i saw Chip and Jon and maybe others were interessed how to remove the reflections on the glass. Today i wrote this little tutorial. Enjoy In this tutorial i will try to give you an idea what a Polarization filter can do with your future photography of watches. (Here you will see 2 pictures of my Polarization Filter.) I will do the test, the first one is normally taken to much reflection as you see. I will turn a bit with the bezel.. it looks much better isn't it? Reflections... : No reflections... : I hope this tutorial was useful for you. Good luck!
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Nov 8, 2005 7:03:31 GMT -6
Thank Erik! I've been meaning to pick up a polarization filter anyway....even more excuse to buy one now.
|
|
CHIP
WWF Founder
Ad Astra Per Aspera
Posts: 37,799
Name: Chip
Location: Dallas
Since: Oct 8, 2005 17:08:57 GMT -6
|
Post by CHIP on Nov 8, 2005 7:14:15 GMT -6
Good job Erik!! Thanks man!
|
|
|
Post by erik on Nov 8, 2005 8:23:02 GMT -6
Thanks Sam and Chip. Sam just do it you won't regret it Chip, i have no idea if that filter fits on your current camera...
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Nov 8, 2005 8:33:15 GMT -6
I will Erik. That's the same one I need for my camera....58mm.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Nov 8, 2005 8:58:27 GMT -6
Very nice Erik thanks To bad they dont make filters for point and shoot cameras.
|
|
|
Post by Warren on Nov 8, 2005 9:06:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by erik on Nov 8, 2005 9:38:33 GMT -6
Adam thank you. The problem "i guess" is you can not see the results with a point and shoot camera.
Wetowne, interesting.. but sounds very very difficult..
|
|
Ben
WWF Veteran
Glash?tte Original
Posts: 1,579
Since: Oct 31, 2005 18:54:08 GMT -6
|
Post by Ben on Nov 8, 2005 19:03:43 GMT -6
Greetings, Polarizing filters (circular polarizers for autofocus cameras) are very useful tools that can correct a variety of things as well as enhance images (bluer skies etc.). However, I must point out that the positioning of the reflective surface, regarding the object being photographed, in relation to whatever light source you are using is a more important factor than using a polarizer. Often a polarizer's "influence" on a reflective surface is minimal. It depends on the degree of specular reflection. Another point to make is that polarizers raise the overall contrast of an image, which could cause objectionable problems with things like stainless steel watch cases and other specular highlights. This can be tweaked in Photoshop et al. with level, curve and saturation controls, but it's something to think about. Finally, polarizers reduce your exposure by 2 to 3 stops, so hand holding the camera with ambient light sources is difficult to impossible. Tripods required here. -Ben
|
|
Ben
WWF Veteran
Glash?tte Original
Posts: 1,579
Since: Oct 31, 2005 18:54:08 GMT -6
|
Post by Ben on Nov 8, 2005 19:11:59 GMT -6
Adam thank you. The problem "i guess" is you can not see the results with a point and shoot camera. Wetowne, interesting.. but sounds very very difficult.. If your digital camera has an LCD screen on the rear that can be kept on for composing your shot etc.; then you can see the effect of the polarizer on that LCD image to a large degree. Oh....cameras like the Canon G2 have accessory filter holders that bayonet on over the lens and allow filters, close-up lenses, ring flashes and other neat stuff to be used with them. Many Olympus models also have this feature. Quite useful -Ben
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Nov 8, 2005 19:28:48 GMT -6
That's some good advice Ben....thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Warren on Nov 9, 2005 4:12:47 GMT -6
Ben offers some good advice here. I use my polarizer rarely because of the limitations that he points out.I find it useful mainly for shooting outside on a sunny day. Most of my shooting is done indoors using a light tent with movable lamps, here the best strategy for minimizing glare from the crystal is very careful positioning of the lamps, the subject and the camera. It's mostly trial and error but patience and careful composition will usually produce better results than simply relying on technology.
|
|
|
Post by erik on Nov 9, 2005 6:32:17 GMT -6
Yes you are both right Ben and Wetowne. Thanks for the information.
|
|